首页 News 正文

Hot search first! Alibaba was sentenced to compensate JD 1 billion! The response is coming

抱瓮叟势
1315 0 0

JD v. Alibaba's "two choice one" case, the first instance result is announced!
On December 29th, the entry # Alibaba was sentenced to compensate JD 1 billion # topped the Weibo hot search list, and its popularity continues to rise.
On the afternoon of December 29th, JD Blackboard News released a statement on the first instance victory of JD v. Alibaba's "two choice one" case. The statement stated that the Beijing Higher People's Court has made a judgment, determining that Alibaba's abuse of market dominance and implementation of a "two choice" monopoly behavior have been established, causing serious damage to JD.com, and has ordered compensation of 1 billion yuan to JD.com.
In response, Alibaba stated that it has been informed of this news and we respect the court's ruling.
Take a look at the details——
JD.com claims to have received a compensation of 1 billion yuan

Alibaba: Respect the judgment result

Firstly, let's take a look at the statement released by JD Blackboard News——
On December 29th, the Beijing Higher People's Court made a first instance judgment in the case of JD v. Zhejiang Tmall Network Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Tmall Technology Co., Ltd., and Alibaba Group Holding Co., Ltd., determining that their abuse of market dominance and implementation of "two choice one" monopolistic behavior were established, causing serious damage to JD, and ordered compensation of 1 billion yuan to JD. We appreciate the fair judgment of the court! Thank you to all sectors of society for their support in safeguarding JD's own rights and pursuing fairness and justice!
This judgment is not only a fair ruling by JD.com against the "two choice one" monopoly behavior, but also a landmark moment in maintaining a fair competition order in the market through the rule of law. It will also be a significant contribution to China's anti monopoly legal process.
Fair competition is the core of a market economy, and monopolistic behaviors such as "two choices" not only restrict market competition, damage the legitimate rights and interests of brands, businesses, and consumers, but also weaken the innovation and vitality of market development.
From the lawsuit initiated by JD.com in 2017 to resist the "one out of two" monopoly, to the breaking of the industry's hidden rules of "super anchor price monopoly" in 2023, JD.com has always been seeking development for brands and businesses, and competing for low prices for consumers. This judgment has greatly inspired JD's business belief in adhering to the right path of success, and we will devote ourselves with greater confidence to supporting the high-quality development of the real economy.
In response, Alibaba stated that it has been informed of this news and we respect the court's ruling.
"Choose either" to disrupt e-commerce order

The conflict and lawsuit between JD.com and Alibaba regarding the "one out of two" policy has a long history.
Looking back, as early as 2013, JD.com publicly stated that some merchants were forced to "choose between two" by Alibaba. On the eve of Double 11, 2015, "Mulin Sen" sent an official letter to JD.com stating that due to pressure from a certain platform, the brand would withdraw JD's venue resources. Subsequently, JD.com reported under its real name that Alibaba had "forced" merchants to choose between two options, seriously disrupting the order of the e-commerce market.
In 2017, JD.com officially filed a lawsuit against Alibaba with the Beijing Higher People's Court, choosing between two options. In 2019, the Supreme People's Court made a final ruling rejecting Alibaba's request for "objection to jurisdiction" and determining that the Beijing Higher People's Court has jurisdiction over this case.
In 2020, the Beijing Higher People's Court organized a non-public cross examination of the JD v. Alibaba "two choice one" monopoly case. Until this disclosure by JD.com, in December 2023, the Beijing Higher People's Court determined that Alibaba's abuse of market dominance and implementation of a "two choice" monopoly behavior was established, and ordered a compensation of 1 billion yuan to JD.com.
In February 2021, the State Council Anti Monopoly Commission issued the "Anti Monopoly Guidelines of the State Council Anti Monopoly Commission on the Platform Economy". The Guidelines mention that anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies should adhere to four principles to carry out anti-monopoly supervision in the field of platform economy: protecting fair market competition, conducting scientific and efficient supervision in accordance with the law, stimulating innovation and creativity, and safeguarding the legitimate interests of all parties.
In addition, in April 2021, Alibaba was fined RMB 18.228 billion by the State Administration for Market Regulation for choosing between two, setting a historical record. At that time, Alibaba stated, "We sincerely accept and resolutely comply with this punishment. We will strengthen our lawful operations, further strengthen the construction of compliance systems, focus on innovative development, and better fulfill social responsibilities.".
In August 2021, the State Administration for Market Regulation stated in the "Provisions on Prohibiting Unfair Competition on the Internet (Draft for Public Solicitation of Opinions)" that it will face stricter and more detailed supervision of unfair competition behaviors in the online field, such as the "two choice" of online platforms, big data killing, and false online advertising and transactions.
For the common "two to one" phenomenon on internet platforms, it is required that operators shall not use technological means to reduce transaction opportunities between other operators by influencing user selection, limiting flow, blocking, and delisting goods, and implement "two to one" behavior, obstructing or disrupting the normal operation of network products or services legally provided by other operators, and disrupting the fair competition order in the market.
Time has changed, and in recent years, with the continuous struggle of e-commerce giants and the rise of live streaming newcomers, it is no longer common to demand consumers to choose between two options. However, regulatory authorities continue to remind businesses to strictly prohibit "one or two" behavior.
For example, during last month's "Double Eleven" period, the State Administration for Market Regulation issued the "Double Eleven" Network Centralized Promotion Compliance Reminder to e-commerce platform enterprises. It is mentioned that unfair competition is strictly prohibited. Strictly prohibit illegal activities such as choosing between two options and participate in market competition fairly. Take proactive measures to prevent illegal activities such as false trading, brushing orders, and speculation within the platform.
CandyLake.com 系信息发布平台,仅提供信息存储空间服务。
声明:该文观点仅代表作者本人,本文不代表CandyLake.com立场,且不构成建议,请谨慎对待。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

  •   知名做空机构香橼研究(Citron Research)周四(11月21日)在社交媒体平台X上发布消息称,该公司已决定做空“比特币大户”微策略(Microstrategy)这家公司,并认为该公司已经将自己变身成为一家比特币投资基金 ...
    caffycat
    昨天 11:18
    支持
    反对
    回复
    收藏
  •   每经AI快讯,11月20日,文远知行宣布旗下自动驾驶环卫车S6与无人扫路机S1分别在新加坡滨海湾海岸大道与滨海艺术中心正式投入运营。据介绍,这是新加坡首个商业化运营的自动驾驶环卫项目。 ...
    star8699
    3 天前
    支持
    反对
    回复
    收藏
  •   上证报中国证券网讯(记者王子霖)11月20日,斗鱼发布2024年第三季度未经审计的财务报告。本季度斗鱼依托丰富的游戏内容生态,充分发挥主播资源和新业务潜力,持续为用户提供高质量的直播内容及游戏服务,进一步 ...
    goodfriendboy
    3 天前
    支持
    反对
    回复
    收藏
  •   人民网北京11月22日电 (记者栗翘楚、任妍)2024广州车展,在新能源汽车占据“半壁江山”的同时,正加速向智能网联新能源汽车全面过渡,随着“端到端”成为新宠,智能驾驶解决方案成为本届广州车展各大车企竞 ...
    3233340
    昨天 17:06
    支持
    反对
    回复
    收藏
抱瓮叟势 新手上路
  • 粉丝

    0

  • 关注

    0

  • 主题

    0